Today I received feedbacks from Pak Agung, Bu Tiwi, and Bu Tisa. Bu Tiwi and Bu Tisa have a lot of comments of my draft of written documentation while Pak Agung is only an overall, so I can state his comments here:
“For Adela, I gave her 5
- Lack of references in her writing. Most of them are her own ideas.
- She put the process in the "analysis of information" instead of the "analysis of process and out come".
- Need more exploration of AoI aspect(s) during the process.”
The difficulty that I find is how to revise my draft; should I revise my draft one by one according to the feedbacks or should I put together all of the feedbacks at one and then revise my draft. I will solve this by revise my draft step by step according to each feedback. So I will work on the feedbacks given by Bu Tiwi first, then Bu Tisa, and then Pak Agung.
This activity leads me to have a better understanding about PP and its expectation that I must ask for different supervisors to check my draft of written documentation in order of accuracy and to achieve the highest grade.
“For Adela, I gave her 5
- Lack of references in her writing. Most of them are her own ideas.
- She put the process in the "analysis of information" instead of the "analysis of process and out come".
- Need more exploration of AoI aspect(s) during the process.”
The difficulty that I find is how to revise my draft; should I revise my draft one by one according to the feedbacks or should I put together all of the feedbacks at one and then revise my draft. I will solve this by revise my draft step by step according to each feedback. So I will work on the feedbacks given by Bu Tiwi first, then Bu Tisa, and then Pak Agung.
This activity leads me to have a better understanding about PP and its expectation that I must ask for different supervisors to check my draft of written documentation in order of accuracy and to achieve the highest grade.
No comments:
Post a Comment